Thank you for visiting the consultation website and taking the time to answer our survey
The following questions refer to sections within the draft Development Framework. Exhibition boards summarising the different sections of the draft Development Framework are shown below. The full document is available to download here.

This introduction board (click here to view) provides more information about the project and process so far.
Section B: St Peter Port Regeneration Areas (Click here to view summary boards or download the full draft Development Framework here)
B1. Do you agree with the Vision statement and objectives for St Peter Port Regeneration Areas as a whole? (Click here for extract)
a. Vision statement



Please explain why
b. Objective 1: To reinforce each of the Regeneration Area’s roles as gateways into the central Town area



c. Objective 2: To improve the quality of the public realm



d. Objective 3: To increase the vibrancy, activity and viability of St Peter Port as the primary centre



B2. What are the most positive things that the draft Development Framework proposes in regard to St Peter Port Regeneration Areas as a whole? (refer to pages 22-28 of the draft Development Framework)Please select all that apply





If 'other', please comment:
B3. Do you think that developments within the Regeneration Areas should make a proportionate contribution to public realm improvements to help deliver the wider regeneration benefits for each Regeneration Area?



Please comment
B4. Do you think the draft Development Framework will support the positive regeneration of St Peter Port Regeneration Areas?



Please comment
B5. Are there any changes you would suggest to this section of the Development Framework?


Section C: Lower Pollet Regeneration Area (Click here to view summary boards or download the full draft Development Framework here)

C1. Do you agree with the Vision statement and objectives for Lower Pollet Regeneration Area? (Click here for extract)
a. Vision statement



Please explain why
b. Objective 1: upgrade and develop North Plantation and its surrounding frontage



c. Objective 2: Improve the public realm and pedestrian connections



d. Objective 3: Increase the opportunity for town centre living and other uses



C2. Do you agree with the proposed Development Guidelines set out for Lower Pollet Regeneration Area?
Section C.3.1 Land use and activity principles:
a. Frontage and activity opportunities (refer to page 36 of the draft Development Framework)



b. Refurbishment / conversion of uses (refer to pages 36-37 of the draft Development Framework)



Section C.3.2 Built form principles:
c. Key views (refer to page 37 of the draft Development Framework)



d. Urban design approach to character (refer to page 37 of the draft Development Framework)



Section C.3.3 Public realm, landscape and biodiversity opportunities and requirements:
e. Lower Pollet Northern Town Gateway area (refer to page 37 of the draft Development Framework)



f. Taxi rank (refer to pages 37-38 of the draft Development Framework)



g. North Plantation (refer to page 39 of the draft Development Framework)



h. La Plaiderie (refer to page 40 of the draft Development Framework)



Section C.3.4 Pedestrian and cycle accessibility and movement:
i. Pedestrian accessibility and movement (refer to pages 40-41 of the draft Development Framework)



j. Cycle accessibility and movement (refer to page 41 of the draft Development Framework)



Section C.3.5 Longer term opportunities for areas within the surrounding context:
k. North Beach car park (refer to page 41 of the draft Development Framework)



l. Admiral Park (refer to page 41 of the draft Development Framework)



C3. Overall do you think the proposed development guidelines will support the positive regeneration of Lower Pollet Regeneration Area?



Please explain why
C4. Are there any changes you would suggest to this section of the Development Framework?


Section D: South Esplanade and Mignot Plateau Regeneration Area (Click here to view summary boards or download the full draft Development Framework here)

D1. Do you agree with the Vision statement and objectives for South Esplanade and Mignot Plateau Regeneration Area? (Click here for extract)
a. Vision statement



Please explain why
b. Objective 1: Mignot Plateau should be a main public attraction



c. Objective 2: South Esplanade should be a well-integrated multi-functional public open space



d. Objective 3: Church Square should provide a setting appropriate to the function and historical significance of Town Church



e. Objective 4: improve overall pedestrian accessibility



D2. Do you agree with the proposed Development Guidelines set out for South Esplanade and Mignot Plateau Regeneration Area?
Section D.3.1 Land use and activity principles:
a. Frontage and activity opportunities (refer to page 49 of the draft Development Framework)



Section D.3.2 Built form principles:
b. Key views (refer to page 50 of the draft Development Framework)



c. Urban design approach to character (refer to pages 50-52 of the draft Development Framework)



Section D.3.3 Public realm, landscape and biodiversity opportunities and requirements:
d. South Esplanade Southern Town Gateway (refer to page 53 of the draft Development Framework)



e. South Esplanade public open space (refer to pages 53-58 of the draft Development Framework)



f. Church Square (refer to page 59 of the draft Development Framework)



g. Mignot Plateau (refer to page 59 of the draft Development Framework)



h. Mignot Plateau landscaped area (refer to page 59 of the draft Development Framework)



Section D.3.4 Pedestrian and cycle accessibility and movement:
i. Pedestrian accessibility and movement (refer to pages 60-61 of the draft Development Framework)



j. Cycle accessibility and movement (refer to page 61 of the draft Development Framework)



Section D.3.5 Longer term opportunities for areas within the surrounding context:
k. Albert Pier (refer to page 61 of the draft Development Framework)



l. Castle Pier (refer to page 61 of the draft Development Framework)



D3. Overall do you think the proposed development guidelines will support the positive regeneration of South Esplanade and Mignot Plateau Regeneration Area?



Please explain why
D4. Are there any changes you would suggest to this section of the Development Framework?


Section E: Mansell Street / Le Bordage Regeneration Area (Click here to view summary boards or download the full draft Development Framework here)

E1. Do you agree with the Vision statement and objectives for Mansell Street / Le Bordage Regeneration Area? (Click here for extract)
a. Vision statement



Please explain why
b. Objective 1: Improving Trinity Square



c. Objective 2: Creating a unified strategy for Mansell Street shop units



d. Objective 3: Enabling upper floors to be converted to residential



E2. Do you agree with the proposed Development Guidelines set out for Mansell Street / Le Bordage Regeneration Area?
Section E.3.1 Land use and activity principles:
a. ‘Old Quarter’ as a destination (refer to page 68 of the draft Development Framework)



b. Frontage and activity opportunities (refer to page 68 of the draft Development Framework)



c. Refurbishment / conversion of uses (refer to pages 68-70 of the draft Development Framework)



Section E.3.2 Built form principles:
d. Urban design approach to character (refer to page 70 of the draft Development Framework)



Section E.3.3 Public realm, landscape and biodiversity opportunities and requirements:
e. Mansell Street Western Town Gateway (refer to pages 70-71 of the draft Development Framework)



f. Trinity Square (refer to page 71 of the draft Development Framework)



Section E.3.4 Pedestrian and cycle accessibility and movement:
g. Pedestrian accessibility and movement (refer to pages 71-72 of the draft Development Framework)



Section E.3.5 Longer term opportunities for areas within the surrounding context:
h. Mill Street as part of the Old Quarter (refer to page 72 of the draft Development Framework)



i. Public parking at Sir Charles Frossard House (refer to page 72 of the draft Development Framework)



E3. Overall do you think the proposed development guidelines will support the positive regeneration of Mansell Street / Le Bordage Regeneration Area?



Please explain why
E4. Are there any changes you would suggest to this section of the Development Framework?
About you
How old are you?








Your personal information is captured, held and processed by Participatr Limited for the purposes of this project only. Participatr Limited has created and launched this engagement platform on behalf of the States of Guernsey Development & Planning Authority and Tibbalds. We collectively make decisions about how personal information is captured, held, processed and analysed, meaning that we are joint data controllers for the purposes of the General Data Protection Regulation.

Your name and email address is used to identify you as a single respondent and send you news and information about this project. Your postcode is used to understand your broad location and will not be used in any way to contact you directly. All of your personal information is held in a secure database on a server located in the United Kingdom. For more information about how we use your personal information, please visit our privacy policy.
Share this page:
Engagement platform powered by Participatr on behalf of Tibbalds Planning and Urban Design

Privacy and cookie policy // Website terms of use // Accessibility statement